Sunday, December 7, 2014

Sunday, November 23, 2014

Monday, October 27, 2014

U.S. Treasury Department encouraging annuities...

Washington Tweaks Retirement Fund Policy to Encourage Annuities

The U.S. Treasury Department said on Friday it was tweaking its policy for retirement funds to encourage savers to buy annuities, a measure aimed to keep them from outliving their savings.
The department and the Internal Revenue Service will let retirement funds offer long-term deferred annuities as a default investment in 401(k) retirement accounts. The guidance builds on the tax break the Treasury announced in July for retirement savers who want to buy the annuities.
For people saving for retirement, purchasing an annuity is a tool for locking in a steady outcome in case they live longer than they plan.
"By encouraging the use of income annuities, today's guidance can help retirees protect themselves from outliving their savings," J. Mark Iwry, Treasury deputy assistant secretary for retirement and health policy, said in a statement.
(Reporting by Jason Lange; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama)

Monday, September 29, 2014

Why Housing Costs are the Biggest Threat to Your Retirement



We should be looking at smaller "starter" homes as our "stay put" homes.

Time was that retirees were supposed pay down their mortgages or drastically downsize their homes before retirement. But that behavior has changed, perhaps as a result of the refinancing boom or the housing crash—or both. According to the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau, more people are carrying mortgage debt into their retirement years, up from 22% in 2001 to 30% in 2011.Moreover, the costs of maintaining a home remain stubbornly high as we age, according to a new analysis by the Employee Benefit Research Institute. For those 75 and older, housing expenses accounted for a whopping 43% of spending, even as other expenditures (except for health care) dropped.If there is one thing we have been trained to fear about retirement, it’s crippling medical bills that threaten to force us out of our homes and decimate our nest eggs. But it turns out that we might be better off worrying about our future housing expenses, as these costs are the single largest category of spending in retirement.
Even as the rate of homeownership has remained stable, the median amount owed on mortgages for people aged 75 and older increased 82% during that same decade, from $43,000 to $79,000. Delinquency in paying mortgages and foreclosures also greatly increased for seniors from 2007 to 2011.
The lesson in all this is that while financing one’s home can be hugely beneficial, mortgages can grow into significant burdens when you’re living on a fixed income. The time to stretch yourself financially on a home is not when you’ve already left the workforce and have no way to make more money.
It’s not just larger mortgages that saddle retirees—it’s everything that comes with homeownership, including property taxes, homeowner’s insurance, home repairs, housecleaning, gardening and yard services. At the same time, transportation, entertainment and travel expenses all tend to decline as a natural course of retirement.
It seems that people have an easier time forgoing vacations and restaurant dining than they do square footage and lawns, which is understandable. The comforts of home can bring great stability during a time of transition. But as we struggle to figure out how much money we will need in retirement, we might need to consider how to defray the expense of these patterns.
For those in mid-career, now is the time to get control of our mortgage costs. As a recent study by Pew Charitable Trusts shows, Gen X has lower wealth than their parents did at their age, in large part because they hold nearly six times more debt, including student loans, unpaid medical bills and credit card balances. And that’s despite having generally higher family incomes than their parents did.
Given these headwinds, we may want to rethink the American way of constantly trading up to larger houses through our 40s and 50s. The more we grow accustomed to more luxurious living, the harder it will be to downsize when it makes sense. Perhaps instead of looking at smaller houses merely as “starter homes,” we should be looking at them as “stay put” homes instead.
Millennials face a different challenge. After taking longer to get started in their careers, they will end up buying houses later in life, which means they risk carrying significant mortgages into retirement. They would benefit from not biting off more than they can chew—putting more cash down than the minimum, not buying more house then they can really afford, and making sure to max out out their 401(k)s or IRAs. Home equity can be an excellent investment, but only if it enhances rather than jeopardizes financial security—now and in the future.
http://time.com/money/3418195/retirement-housCing-costs-threat/
By: Ruth Davis Konigsberg 
Konigsberg is the author of The Truth About Griefa contributor to the anthology Money Changes Everything, and a director at Arden Asset Management. The views expressed are solely her own.

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Take the worry out of retirement and high college costs...

Parents worry that high college costs will hurt their retirement, survey shows

Sep. 19, 2014 at 7:06 AM ET
College or retirement? A rising number of parents are concerned they can't pay for both.
featurepics.com
Parents worry that they won't have enough to retire as a result of their kids' college tuition costs.
As families struggle to pay the skyrocketing costs of higher education, a growing number of parents are concerned that the money they borrow for their child’s tuition will hurt their retirement.
In a recent survey, a majority (54 percent) of the parents said they’re worried that their retirement will be jeopardized by student loan debt. That survey was done for Citizens Financial Group which operates Citizens Bank and Charter One Bank.
“Households are feeling the pinch of higher tuition costs and it’s starting to impact other big things in their lives,” said Brendan Coughlin, president of auto and education finance at Citizens Financial Group. “Getting a college degree is still very much a part of the American dream.
"Parents are very aware and supportive of this, but they’re also very worried about the cost and how to pay for it.”
It’s not surprising that most parents (94 percent) said they feel an increased financial burden from their child’s college debt, according to this survey. What’s alarming is the fact that nearly half (45 percent) said they don’t have a plan to pay for that debt.
“People who have a financial plan for any sort of major expense are more likely to succeed,” said Robert Brokamp, editor of the Motley Fool Rule Your Retirement newsletter. “If you don’t have a plan for how you are going to pay off those loans, you’re just flying blind. It will take much longer and you’ll wind up paying more.”
Brokamp, a former financial adviser, thinks college financial planning should start well before your child is a junior or senior in high school and before you apply for financial aid or take out any loans.
“When it comes time to take out loans, look at who applies for them,” Brokamp said. “Kids will often be eligible for lower-rate loans and loans where the interest is tax deductable.”
Of course, free money is the best. Exhaust all sources of grants and scholarships before you start applying for loans.
“Parents who borrow to help their children pay for college should not borrow more than they can afford to repay in 10 years or whenever they retire, whichever comes first,” advised Mark Kantrowitz, senior vice president and publisher of Edvisors.com, a website that provides free information to families about financial aid and dealing with college costs.
Kantrowitz urges parents to save as much as possible before their child enrolls in college, because it’s so much cheaper to save than borrow. “When you save, you’re earning the interest; when you borrow, you’re paying the interest,” he said. “Every dollar you borrow will cost about two dollars by the time you pay back that debt.”
Keep in mind: Most financial experts advise parents to focus on their retirement first and their children’s college education second. “It may not be easy to do, but you have to pay yourself first and too many people get that backwards,” said Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate.com.
“The kids can borrow to go to college, you can’t borrow to retire.”
Herb Weisbaum is The ConsumerMan. Follow him on Facebook and Twitter or visit The ConsumerMan website.

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

Excellent article about 401K's:

Since the dark days of 2008, employers have taken some steps to fix the 401(k), the backbone of the nation’s private retirement-savings system. But Nobel laureate, Robert Merton, says that in the rush to upgrade these plans, plan sponsors and administrators have overlooked one big problem: They are managing these plans with the wrong goal in mind.
Bloomberg News
Merton says a crisis is coming for 401(k) investors.

“The seeds of an investment crisis have been sown,” the MIT professor of finance writes in an article in the July-August issue of Harvard Business Review, which was published Tuesday. “The only way to avoid a catastrophe is for plan participants, professionals, and regulators to shift the mind-set and metrics from asset value to income,” writes Merton, who won the Nobel Prize in 1997.

In recent years, employers have tried to improve 401(k)s by introducing features such as automatic enrollment and products including target-date funds. But in his article and in a recent interview with Encore, Merton said these moves weren’t likely to be sufficient. To fix the 401(k), he argues, employers and the financial services companies that manage these plans must get past the ongoing obsession with two things: Account balances and annual returns. These metrics, Merton says, are far less important than one other: The amount of sustainable income an employee can expect to receive in retirement.
By disclosing annual income, instead of (or in addition to) an account balance, Merton says, employers will help employees quickly and easily calculate how much of their annual salary they can expect to replace in retirement, together with Social Security. As a result, employees will be better able to take action to ensure they are on track to retire as planned.
But that’s only half the battle. In order to accurately calculate how much retirement income a participant’s 401(k) balance will purchase, the plan sponsor must assume the money will be invested in an inflation-adjusted deferred annuity or long-term U.S. Treasury bonds. These investments, Merton writes, ensure “spendable income” that’s “secure for the life” of the bond or annuity and are “the very assets that are the safest from a retirement income perspective.”
That’s not to say that 401(k) money shouldn’t be invested in stocks. In fact, Merton says, 401(k) investment managers should invest participants’ savings in a mixture of “risky assets,” including equities, and “risk-free assets,” such as long-term U.S. Treasuries and deferred annuities. Moreover, the investment manager should shift the investment mix over time to optimize the likelihood of success.
Employers, he says, should begin by asking employees not about their tolerance for investment risk, but about their expectations for income needs in retirement.
If the investments are managed well, the employee – upon retirement—should have enough money to buy a deferred, inflation-indexed annuity that (together with Social Security) will replace his or her salary in retirement. Retirees who don’t want to buy an annuity don’t have to. But once they achieve their retirement income goal, he says, they’d be foolish to leave their money at risk in the stock market.
“Think of risk as a tool,” he writes. “When you don’t need it, get rid of as much of it as you can because it’s costly. When we take a risk, it’s generally for a good reason. You wouldn’t normally put yourself in harm’s way for no reason.”

Thursday, August 28, 2014

Indexed Universal Life (IUL) Great Retirement Plan for Pension-like Income!

Indexed Universal Life Insurance as a ROTH IRA Alternative


THE CONCEPT:
There are many vehicles for people to generate retirement income.  IRAs are a common alternative.  A ROTH IRA has benefits of not only income tax deferral but also tax free income.  Of course a ROTH IRA has disadvantages including possibility of loss due to market performance (if using mutual funds), and limitations as to usage including contribution and income limits.  When using an indexed universal life policy, the cash value can be used to generate the benefits of a ROTH IRA and more.  The benefits of life insurance include a lack of client income tests on contribution limits.  For many life insurance can be a compelling option as an alternative or supplement to a ROTH IRA for generating retirement income.
SOLUTION:
An Indexed Universal Life insurance policy will ensure financial security and retirement if something were to happen before retirement.  An Indexed Universal Life insurance policy presents several additional benefits:
  • No funding limitation
  • Tax free income if taken via loans and policy remains in force
  • Life insurance provides leveraged remaining assets post retirement via death benefit
  • No early withdrawal penalties
  • Private and probate free
  • Competitive performance
  • Downside performance protection
  • Chronic Illness Accelerated Benefits
For the many people that are not allowed to fund a ROTH IRA, or contribute as much money as they'd like to one, an indexed universal life insurance policy can be a very attractive alternative.
There is a small but meaningful shift going on in the retirement savings world.  Most people don't think of life insurance as a potentially powerful part of a retirement plan.  For many people, a properly structured indexed universal life insurance policy can be an attractive ROTH IRA alternative and one of the best ways to prepare for a prosperous retirement.
ROTH IRAs are often suggested as a great retirement planning tool for a number of compelling reasons and indexed universal life policies can offer many similar attractions.
Most people know that ROTH investors don't get the tax deduction like when contributing to traditional IRAs.  But if you believe taxes will be much higher in the future than today, foregoing an initial tax deduction today on a smaller amount of money in return for tax-free retirement income (on a larger amount of money) in the future is a smart trade-off.  Plus ROTH IRAs don't have the annual required minimum distributions that start at age 70 ½ like traditional IRAs either.
But the problem for many is that they earn too much money to be allowed to fund a ROTH IRA.  Or even if people do qualify to contribute to a ROTH, the most they can contribute in any tax year is $5,000 - $6,000 depending on if they are age 50 or older.
This is how an indexed universal life insurance policy fits into a situation where tax-free retirement income and funding flexibility is desired.
When properly structured, the cash accumulation in a cash-value life insurance policy can be accessed through policy loans or withdrawals on a tax free basis under tax law that's been in place for decades.  Index universal life insurance may be the fastest growing type of universal life insurance because cash in the policy is credited interest based on stock or bond market index performance with no risk of declines.
Most indexed universal life insurance (IUL) policies credit interest based on the performance of the S&P 500 index (or some other major market index or indexes) subject to a cap on annual crediting (usually between 11-15%) as well as a floor of interest credits (usually 0%-2%) when the index itself has a negative performance.  So when the index performs positively but below the cap, the cash in the policy will be credited with that same amount of interest.  If the index performs better than the cap, the policy would be credited with the interest amount subject to the cap.  In years when the index is negative, the policy would be credited with the "floor" amount of interest but the cash accumulation does not go backwards due to the negative performance.
Another reason for the shift towards life insurance is, just like ROTH IRAs, there are no minimum required distributions with an indexed universal life insurance policy.  More importantly, the biggest reason why these policies make attractive ROTH IRA alternatives is that anyone, regardless of their income level, can fund a policy to almost any amount of money that they'd like.  So for those who earn more than the ROTH income limits as well as those who don't want to be limited in their annual retirement funding, they can put $10,000-$100,000 or perhaps much more away for their retirement.
Of course, the index universal life policies come with a death benefit like all life insurance policies, but when structuring the policy for cash accumulation, we purposely minimize the death benefits to the lowest level the I.R.S allows to keep the policy mortality charges as low as possible.  However, should the insured die prematurely, the death benefit will be substantially greater than the cash in the policy which is another advantage of the life insurance policy over the ROTH.  Consider this "self-completing" as another big advantage of the retirement savings plan.
If you are just interested in temporary death benefit protection instead of cash accumulation, then a term insurance policy may be a better fit. 
And don't confuse index universal life insurance with indexed annuities as earnings from annuities are taxed as ordinary income, along with the fact that crediting caps on index annuities are generally much lower than on index universal life insurance.

By Larry Ottem on April 9th, 2012

Are you planning to retire? Here are a few common mistakes to steer clear of, if possible, while preparing for retirement:

Overlooking Health Care Costs Health care  costs  are projected to continue their current annual increase in rate of more than double ...

Let me to help you plan a safe, secure, worry free retirement

Name

Email *

Message *